Alba Iulia Court of Appeal Section for labor conflicts

Roselin67

ALaw no. the plaintiffs can no longer combine the magistrates pension with the salary obtained from the university activity if the level of this pension exceeds the level of the average gross salary for the economy used to base the state social insurance budget. Through the decision of November the Romanian Constitutional Court found that Law no. is constitutional. On December the Sibiu County Pension House Romania decided to suspend the payment of pensions issued to each claimant. The plaintiffs referred the Sibiu Court Romania in order to request among other things the annulment of.

The decision of December . By the decision of May this court rejected the action Country Email List brought by the plaintiffs. They filed an appeal against the said decision at the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal requesting again to refer the Court with a request for interpretation. By decision of November the and social insurance rejected the action. The applicants request a review of this judgment in particular because they consider that the court that delivered it did not set out the reasons why it refused to give direct and priority effect to the provisions of the FEU Treaty and why it refused to apply the relevant jurisprudence of the Court.




The preliminary question addressed The memorandum of understanding can be considered an act decision communication etc. with legal value in the sense established by the Court of Justice Judgment of February Manghera and others and Judgment of March FranceCommission C and can it be subject to the interpretation of the Court If so the memorandum of understanding must be interpreted in the sense that in order to reduce the effects of the economic crisis by reducing staff costs the European Commission can validly impose the adoption of a national law by which.